Skip to content
Pibbly, a pebble of maths, a lifetime of ripplesPibbly
For directors and kindergarten teachers

How does Pibbly map to EYLF and QKLG?

Primarily to EYLF V2.0 Outcome 5, through the key component “Children begin to understand how symbols and pattern systems work”, and to the QKLG 2024 key focus “Building numeracy in personally meaningful ways” under Communicating.

Below is every mapping set out in full, with what actually happens in a session that evidences it, and which mappings are direct and which are only supporting. A provider who claims every outcome is claiming none of them.

Where these words come from

Every framework phrase quoted on this page is verbatim from the published documents, not a paraphrase. The EYLF outcomes and key components are as they appear in Belonging, Being and Becoming V2.0 (2022). The QKLG areas and key focuses are as they appear in the Queensland kindergarten learning guideline 2024. The pairing of the two follows the QCAA’s own alignment table, rather than Pibbly’s reading of it.

Two notes worth having, because both are places providers get it wrong. EYLF V2.0 does not number its sub-outcomes: the familiar “5.4” style is V1.0 and QCAA calls them key components, so this page quotes rather than numbers them. And QKLG 2024 has no “numeracy descriptors”: it has learning and development areas with key focuses, plus a continua of learning and development that the service’s own teacher uses. Anyone citing QKLG descriptors is quoting an older document.

EYLF V2.0

Which EYLF outcomes does a session evidence?

Seven key components across three outcomes. Five are direct and two are supporting, and the difference is stated rather than blurred.

DirectOutcome 5: Children are effective communicators

“Children begin to understand how symbols and pattern systems work”

This is the closest match the framework has to what a soroban is. A soroban is a symbol system with two rules: the bead above the bar is worth five, each of the four below is worth one, and only beads touching the bar are counted. A child builds seven as the gold bead and two green rather than counting seven objects, so the quantity is represented rather than tallied. The same digit is always built the same way, which is what makes it a system rather than a collection of beads.

DirectOutcome 5: Children are effective communicators

“Children interact verbally and non-verbally with others for a range of purposes”

Sessions run in groups of up to 8, so children describe what they have built, compare it with a neighbour's and are asked which of two numbers is larger. Mathematical language is used out loud: more, fewer, the same, one more than. The soroban itself is a non-verbal representation, which is why the format also suits children who find heavily verbal learning difficult.

SupportingOutcome 5: Children are effective communicators

“Children express ideas and make meaning using a range of media”

Each child has a workbook that stays with them, with their name and age on the inside cover, and takes home a completed page each week. The beads, the page and the spoken description are three ways of expressing the same idea.

DirectOutcome 4: Children are confident and involved learners

“Children develop a growth mindset and learning dispositions such as curiosity, cooperation, confidence, creativity, commitment, enthusiasm, persistence, imagination and reflexivity”

Children move through the Pibbly workbooks at their own pace rather than as a class, and are not ranked against each other. There is no test, no timer and no homework. A child who is not interested that week is not made to be interested that week. The programme's stated purpose is that a child arrives at school without having already decided how they feel about maths.

DirectOutcome 4: Children are confident and involved learners

“Children develop a range of learning and thinking skills and processes such as problem solving, inquiry, experimentation, hypothesising, researching and investigating”

A child asked to build a number they have not built before tries an arrangement, looks at it, and adjusts. Noticing that four is one bead short of the gold one, and that this is why five is a single bead rather than five beads, is a hypothesis a four-year-old can form and test with their hands in a few seconds.

SupportingOutcome 4: Children are confident and involved learners

“Children transfer and adapt what they have learned from one context to another”

Every child takes home a simple play prompt each week, so the same idea is met at the centre and then at home in a different setting with a different adult. This is a supporting mapping rather than a direct one, because whether the transfer happens depends on the family, not on the session.

SupportingOutcome 1: Children have a strong sense of identity

“Children develop knowledgeable, confident self-identities and a positive sense of self-worth”

Listed as supporting, deliberately. Pibbly's stated aim is the moment a child says "I can do this" about a number, and the small-win structure of a session is built for that. But identity is the whole child across the whole programme, and one thirty-minute weekly session should not be claimed as the driver of it.

EYLF Outcome 2, children are connected with and contribute to their world, and Outcome 3, children have a strong sense of wellbeing, are deliberately absent. A weekly numeracy session does not evidence them and claiming it would weaken everything above.

QKLG 2024

Which QKLG areas and key focuses does it sit under?

Two areas, three key focuses. Numeracy sits inside Communicating in QKLG 2024, alongside language and literacy, rather than in an area of its own.

Communicating

“Building numeracy in personally meaningful ways”

The QKLG describes this focus as building children's capacity, confidence and disposition to use mathematics in everyday situations, and names exploring mathematical ideas such as number and patterns. A Pibbly session is thirty minutes a week of exactly that, in a room the child already knows, with children they already play with, using a physical object they can move.

Active learning

“Building positive dispositions toward learning”

The QKLG names curiosity, creativity and executive function skills for problem-solving under Active learning. Sessions are short, repetitive and hands-on by design, and progress is celebrated rather than compared, which is the disposition half of the programme rather than the content half.

Active learning

“Showing confidence and involvement in learning”

A child who can find any number from zero to nine without counting the beads one by one has a visible, repeatable success they can show an educator or a parent. That is the first milestone the programme aims at, usually inside the first term.

The third Active learning key focus, “Engaging with technologies for learning and communication”, is not claimed. In context it means digital technologies, and a wooden soroban is not one.

For your QIP

What can a service actually put in its Quality Improvement Plan?

Something dated and physical, produced automatically, that your educators do not have to make. Every enrolled child takes home a completed workbook page each week, and the workbook stays with the child as a learning portfolio with their name and age on the inside cover. At the end of a term the service has a visible record of a planned numeracy experience running weekly, and a family that has seen it every week.

What the service does with that is the service’s call. Pibbly provides evidence and a teacher who can describe what a child did. Judging which phase of the continua a child’s learning is more like belongs to your kindergarten teacher, not to a visiting provider, and any provider offering to do that assessment for you is offering something that is not theirs to give.

For the vetting half of the same conversation, the Blue Card, the certificate of currency and the supervision position are all in the questions worth asking any enrichment provider, which is written to be useful whichever provider you choose.

Common questions

The rest, answered

Which EYLF outcome does a soroban session map to?

Primarily EYLF V2.0 Outcome 5, children are effective communicators, and specifically the key component "Children begin to understand how symbols and pattern systems work". A soroban is a symbol system: the bead above the bar is worth five, each of the four below is worth one, and only beads touching the bar are counted, so every number has exactly one correct arrangement. Outcome 4, children are confident and involved learners, is the second mapping, through learning dispositions and through problem solving and experimentation.

Which QKLG learning and development area does it sit under?

Communicating, under the key focus "Building numeracy in personally meaningful ways". The QKLG 2024 places numeracy inside Communicating rather than in its own area, alongside language and literacy. Active learning is the second area, through the key focuses "Building positive dispositions toward learning" and "Showing confidence and involvement in learning".

Does the QKLG have numeracy descriptors?

Not by that name. QKLG 2024 has five learning and development areas, each with key focuses, and a continua of learning and development that teachers use to judge which phase a child's learning is more like. "Descriptors" is not QKLG 2024 terminology, and a provider using it is probably quoting an older document. The correct reference for numeracy is the key focus "Building numeracy in personally meaningful ways" under Communicating.

What can a service put in its Quality Improvement Plan?

Something dated and physical rather than a photograph of a happy child. Every enrolled child takes home a completed workbook page each week, and the workbook itself stays with the child as a learning portfolio with their name and age on it. The service's educators produce none of it. A service can also record the weekly session as a planned experience under Communicating, and hold the provider's Blue Card and certificate of currency on file as part of its own vetting evidence.

Does Pibbly assess children against the QKLG continua?

No, and it should not. The continua of learning and development are used by the kindergarten teacher to make judgements about an individual child's learning, and that judgement belongs to the service, not to a visiting provider. Pibbly provides evidence, in the form of a dated workbook page each week and a teacher who can describe what a child did. What phase that evidence supports is the service's call.

Is Pibbly an accredited or approved programme?

No. Pibbly is a play-based numeracy programme delivered by a registered teacher, not an accredited course and not an approved learning framework. It is designed to sit inside a service's existing programme and to evidence learning the service is already documenting. Nothing on this page is an endorsement by ACECQA, QCAA or the Queensland Government.

Want to see it in your own room first?

The first session is free, for one group, at a time that suits you. No commitment and no paperwork.

Enquiries answered within 2 business days.